(Jan 2023, Dekalb County, GA) One person was killed after law enforcement and environmental activists clashed in Atlanta, GA, over the demolition of 85 acres in Atlanta’s South River Forest to build a privately owned police training center.
Consider this case and look at alternatives available to activists that may be far more effective than civil disobedience.
It concerns this kayaker that a young activist going by the name of Tortuguita was shot by police during an occupation protest, marking the first police killing of a demonstrator in U.S. environmental history. Attorneys for Tortuguita’s family question the police account of the shooting and say the GBI has not answered their questions. NBC News Reports that there is no body camera footage during the incident.
The Public-Private Initiatives (PPI) controversy between the City of Atlanta and the Atlanta Police Foundation has gone on for two years. Environmental groups have opposed the development of a training center in Atlanta, citing that it would strip away tree coverage, put in danger amphibian habitats and migratory birds, induce stormwater flooding, contribute to greenhouse gas concentrations, and allow more polluted urban runoff into the water supply. However, the escalation of violence in Atlanta demonstrates how the movement’s shifting focus could be leading to more direct conflict with police.
Environmental protests have always been a way of showing citizens’ deep concern for their planet, and it’s no different now. But habitat destruction is worsening, leading to more frequent and intense natural disasters, worsening flood risk, creating water shortages, eroding shorelines, increased air and water pollution, food chain collapse, and threatening quality of life, leaving communities desperate for help. At the same time, the risks associated with environmental protesting are greater than ever before. From tear gas and arrests to physical assault, environmental activists face far more dangers when they take to the streets. In this blog post, we’ll explore why environmental protesting is becoming increasingly unsafe, and how activists can protect themselves in these dangerous times.
The differences between lobbying and protesting for change.
Lobbying is the act of trying to convince lawmakers to vote a certain way on legislation. Protests, on the other hand, are public demonstrations against something, typically involving large groups of people. Corporate interests invest unaffordable levels of time and money to influence law makers to allocate tax dollars for privately held programs like the Atlanta Police Training Center. In the face of this sort of institutionalized corruption, Individuals and citizens feel hopeless and powerless to affect change, so they put themselves in dangerous and vulnerable positions by protesting. Is there a better way to affect change, prevent private interests from capitalizing on public goods, and minimize the important services nature provides to our civilization?
There are a few key differences between lobbying and protesting. First, lobbying is done in private, while protests are public. Second, lobbyists typically have a specific goal or piece of legislation they’re pushing for, while protesters may have a more general message. Finally, lobbying is considered a more formal activity than protesting.
While both lobbying and protesting can be effective ways to bring about change, protesting carries more risks than lobbying does. In recent years, we’ve seen an increase in violence at protests around the world. In some cases, this violence has been instigated by anti-government groups or individuals with hateful ideologies. In other instances, attempts to disperse the crowd by the police or other security forces have resulted in violence.
Whatever the cause of the violence, it’s clear that protesting comes with a higher risk than lobbying does. If you’re considering taking part in a protest, it’s important to be aware of the risks involved and take steps to protect yourself and others.
In general, traditional protest tactics are ineffective.
In recent years, environmental protesting has become more dangerous than ever. In the past, protesting was typically a peaceful way to voice dissent and bring attention to an issue. However, as the environmental crisis caused by habitat destruction has worsened, so have the tactics of those willing to put their lives on the line to save the planet.
Many of the old protest tactics, such as sit-ins and blockades, are no longer effective in today’s political climate. With the rise of social media, it is easier than ever for protesters to get their message out without putting themselves in danger. Also, the police and other law enforcement officials are now more likely to use violence against protesters because they have become more militarized.
As a result of these changes, large protests are becoming less common and less effective. Instead, smaller groups of dedicated activists are using more targeted methods, such as civil disobedience and direct action, to make their voices heard. While these tactics may be more dangerous, they are also more likely to result in real change.
Protesting can quickly turn negative.
Many people see protesting as a way to make their voices heard and push for change. However, protesting can easily be spun negatively by those who don’t agree with the protesters’ goals.
For example, environmental protests are often seen as disruptive and inconvenient. Some people may view environmental protesters as being against progress or economic development. This negative spin on protesting can make it difficult for people to sympathize with the protesters’ cause.
It’s also important to remember that protesting can be dangerous. In some cases, protesters have been attacked or even killed by those who disagree with them. As such, it’s important for protesters to be aware of the risks before they take part in any demonstration.
Protesters’ energy may be more impactful through lobbying.
In recent years, environmental protesting has become more dangerous than ever. This is due in part to the fact that protesters are now targeting industries and businesses that are directly contributing to climate change. As a result, these companies are taking whatever measures are necessary to protect their interests – even if it means putting protesters in danger.
One way to make environmental protesting more impactful is by lobbying government officials to enact change. This can be done through writing letters, making phone calls, or even organizing rallies. By bringing attention to the issue at hand, lawmakers may be more likely to take action. Imagine your representatives’ calendar being filled up with thousands of appointments made by supporters of environmental causes? Citizens may not be able to bribe officials to vote in their favor, but we can make their lives very inconvenient.
Another way to make environmental protests more impactful is by targeting the media. This can be done by writing op-eds, appearing on TV or radio shows, or even starting your own blog, like GeoTrippin’ Adventures is doing here. Anyone want to start a podcast with us? By getting the word out there, you can help raise awareness about the importance of taking action on climate change. Finally, remember that you don’t have to go it alone. There are plenty of organizations out there that are fighting for the same thing as you are. Find one that aligns with your values and goals, and see how you can contribute.
Volunteer lobbying in the face of massive corporate lobbying groups.
Volunteer lobbying in the face of powerful corporate lobbying groups is an act of civil disobedience with serious consequences.In addition to the personal risks associated with protesting, there is also the risk of arrest and imprisonment. By pulling from the playbook of the corporatists and pounding on doors, making calls, schmoozing, and even bribing government officials like those who would undermine the stability of our ecosystem are so willing to do.
Many people volunteer to lobby on behalf of environmental causes because they believe that it is their civic duty to do so. Others do it because they are passionate about the issue and want to make a difference. Regardless of the motivation, it is important to remember that this type of activism can be very dangerous, and we would be better served by following the democratic channels that exist for us to accomplish the change we wish to see. Kayakers have an opportunity to enact change by collaborating with each other, not to only continue educating our guests on the EcoTours we provide, but by coordinating efforts to inundate elected officials with calls, appointments, letters, and demonstrations outside their offices and capital buildings.